|
Wisconsin Newborn Screening Laboratory
Dec 1999 Newsletter: No. 43 Changes
This newsletter is to announce changes in the Wisconsin
newborn-screening program beginning shortly after the New Year. These
include a switch from Priority Mail to United Parcel Service (UPS)
for delivery of newborn screening specimens to the State Laboratory
and introduction of new testing. The details are as follows:
United Parcel Service
In May of 1998, the newborn screening program introduced
US priority Mail for delivery of newborn screening specimens to the
State Laboratory in Madison. Although this resulted in an improvement
in the timeliness of samples getting to the screening laboratory (24
hours sooner) and dependability, the improvements didn't meet our expectations.
We still are experiencing "lost" samples and actually have seen an
increase in specimens damaged during transport due to leaking water
samples that are also being sent by Priority Mail. In an attempt to
solve these issues, the screening program has decided to the replace
Priority Mail with United Parcel Service (UPS). This change is to take
place on January 3rd 2000. In preparation for this change UPS
will supply you with preaddressed cardboard UPS mailing containers
in late December 1999. As with the priority mail envelopes, put all
samples that are ready to be sent to the screening laboratory each
day in one UPS mailer in time for the UPS pick-up. Most hospitals
already have a daily UPS pick up time. Make sure to find out when that
time is in your hospital. If your institution doesn't have a routine
pick-up time, you can call UPS at 800-742-5877 and ask for an on demand
air pickup when the newborn screening samples are ready to be shipped.
An additional feature UPS provides is the ability to track specific
packages through their system. For example, you will be able to use
the Internet to make sure the samples arrived at the State Laboratory
of Hygiene. As with the current priority mail, this service is at no cost
to you. If you have any questions, please feel free to give the laboratory
a call at 608-262-6547.
Expansion of Newborn Screening Testing Update
In our last Newsletter (April 1999) we stated that
the Department of Heath and Family Services by their rule making authority
added testing for seven Fatty Acid Oxidation (FAO) and seven Organic
Acid (AO) disorders. The most frequent disorder of this group is Medium
Chain Acyl-CoA Dehyrogenase Deficiency or MCAD. The FAO and
OA disorders can be detected in the newborn by measuring the blood
acylcarnitine levels by tandem mass spectroscopy (TM/TM). The newborn
screening laboratory has acquired the instrumention. Since early summer
we have been gaining experience with its operation and detection of
these 14 metabolic disorders. This has been more of a challenge than
we expected. The identification of these disorders is complex as there
is often not a one-to-one correlation between a specific abnormal acylcarnitine
level and a particular disorder. With many of the disorders, there
are a number of acylcarnitines that are abnormal. Interpretations may
also include calculating ratios between various acylcarnitines. Because
this technology is new and the fact that we are one of the first screening
programs in the country using this particular technology, there is
little expertise to tap into. To date we have measured acylcarnitines
on over 25,000 newborn screening samples and have identified one case
of MCAD and SCAD (Short Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency). We
are currently putting the final touches on screening for the FAO and
OA disorders that include establishing acylcarnitine normal ranges,
developing abnormal reporting processes and reports, notifiying parents,
physicians, and hospitals. It is anticipated that routine reporting
of these disorders will start within the first couple of months of
2000. A newsletter devoted entirely to screening for the FAO and OA
disorders will be sent in early January.
The Newborn Screening Year (1999) in Review
Unidentified Cases:
This year a baby with galactosemia slipped through
the newborn screening process without being detected. The abbreviated
story goes likes this. The total galactose result was normal at 56
hours of age and the baby was feeding well before sampling. At about
three weeks of age the baby was hospitalized and a galactosemia diagnosis
was made, after much confusion regarding a significant difference in
blood glucose determination made at the bedside (240 mg/dL) and that
done in the laboratory (98 mg/dL). The bedside glucose method also
reacts to galactose. The State Laboratory re-tested the initial specimen
and confirmed the original findings (normal results). The delay in
symptomatology is atypical of most galactosemic babies, as they are
often very ill within the first week of life. Although the evaluation
on this case incomplete, a mild or new genetic mutation is suspected.
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) was not identified in a baby girl on the
initial newborn screen at 26 hours of age. The baby's doctor repeated the newborn
screen (in the absence of clinical symptoms) at six days of age and the 17-hydroxprogestone
(17-OHP) level was slightly elevated. A third sample at two weeks of age continued
to show an increasing 17-OHP and a referral to a pediatric endocrinologist was
made. Follow-up testing confirmed a salt losing, life threatening form of CAH.
The pediatric endocrinologist subsequently observed mild clitorilmegaly that
was not observed by either the obstetrician or the pediatrician.
Please circulate this information to the medical staff of your institution
as a reminder that the initial newborn screening tests are not absolute guarantees
and that the whole medical team must also rely on clinical judgements.
Remember, any physician or parent (through their physician) in Wisconsin can
request a "repeat" newborn screening test on any child at any age. Repeat testing
is mandated in some states, it is voluntary (elective) in Wisconsin. We recommend
it.
Sampling mix-up possibility:
Twelve newborn screening samples were received on one
day from the same hospital; two had similar elevated TSH levels (~105
mIU/mL). Since the frequency of hypothyroidism is about 1 in 4,000
it seemed unlikely that two hypothyroid cases would be born in the
same hospital at the same time. Confirmatory testing indicated that
one of the babies was indeed hypothyroid and the second was normal.
This was the first time a baby with a TSH level that high (>100 mIU/mL)
was not confirmed to have hypothyroidism in the 20+ years of screening
for the disorder. Although the possibility that the hypothyroid baby
may have been drawn twice and a second, probably "normal" baby not
drawn was never absolutely confirmed, it is very likely that this is
what happened. Please review the newborn screening sample collection
processes in your institution. Be certain that there are no "gaps" where
there could be confusion as to which babies have or have not been drawn.
Follow-Up testing:
A baby with sickle-hemoglobin C disease was detected
on newborn screening. The confirmatory testing on whole blood at a
month of age was done in a reference laboratory instead of the newborn
screening laboratory as recommended. The reference laboratory identified
and reported four hemoglobins (Fetal, adult, sickle and hemoglobin
C), a physiological impossibility. Also the interpretation of the findings
was confusing in that both sickle and hemoglobin C trait was reported
has well as a compound heterozygote for "S" and "C" hemoglobin and
hereditary persistent fetal hemoglobin. It is obvious that the reference
laboratory was inexperienced with testing newborn babies for hemoglobins.
Y2K
The newborn screening laboratory testing processes
are Y2K compliant and should the power grid fail (locally or regionally)
a contingency plan is in place so that the critical testing, Congenital
Adrenal Hyperplasia, Galactosemia, Phenylkentonuria, will be completed
on emergency generated power if needed. Of course there could be reporting
delays of normal results should a significant power failure occur.
Abnormal results would be delivered to the babies physician by what
ever means it takes; phone or personal contact if need be. We as a
laboratory are working with state emergency government and are prepared
to deal with any acute communication needs.
We hope this information about your 1999 Newborn Screening
was interesting and useful. Your continued support and personnel efforts
truly makes newborn screening in Wisconsin a showcase in the nation.
As we close one millennium and start another we look forward to working
with you to continue to provide all children born in Wisconsin the
best quality of life possible.
Happy Holidays and GO BADGERS.
Sincerely,
| Ronald Laessig, Ph.D. |
Gary Hoffman, Supervisor |
| Director, State Laboratory of Hygiene |
Newborn Screening Laboratory |
| Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine |
|
| Professor of Preventive Medicine |
|
|